Hi all, This was more a question of programming aesthetics for me than one of great practical significance. I was looking to perform a certain function on files in a directory so long as those files weren't found in certain standard directories. In other words, I was using os.walk () to get multiple root directory strings, and the lists of files in each directory. The function was to be performed on those files, so long as certain terms weren't in the root directory string.
In actuality, I could have stuck with the helper function I created, but I'm always curious to see how well multiple lines of code can turn into fewer lines of code in python and retain the same functional value :) Matt On Jul 15, 6:46 am, denis <denis-bz...@t-online.de> wrote: > Sure, Aho-Corasick is fast for fixedstrings; but without real > numbers / a concrete goal > > > > Matt, how many words are you looking for, in how long a string ? > > a simple solution is good enough, satisficing. Matt asked "how to > make that function look nicer?" > but "nice" has many dimensions -- bicycles are nice for some tasks, > Ferraris for others. > > Bythewayhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aho-Corasick_algorithmhas a > link to a Python implementation, > alsohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worse_is_Betteris fun. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
