Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > I wonder how many people have been tripped up by the fact that > > ++n > > and > > --n > > fail silently for numeric-valued n.
I doubt that there are many. Plus, you misspelled them from the more obvious n++ and n-- which *do* fail with a SyntaxError. I think I faintly remember trying those in my early Python days and immediately went for "+=" when I saw them fail (as I had expected). Stefan -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list