norseman wrote:
Scott David Daniels wrote:
norseman wrote:
...  A note here:  In reading the original posting I get ...
           then an e with a goatee

Here's something to try in any future circumstances:
  <explanation of use of unicodedata>
Good thought, good idea, useful tool.

BUT - compare your output to what I *see*.
Have you considered font issues when printing?
The best encoding will not show anything reasonable when printed with a
font without the characters in question.  I'm not saying I know its
wrong, only that there is another issue to check.
you might both swap outputs from the over-explict printing I used above.

--Scott David Daniels
scott.dani...@acm.org
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to