Aahz wrote: > In article <157e0345-74e0-4144-a2e6-2b4cc854c...@z7g2000vbh.googlegroups.com>, > Carl Banks <pavlovevide...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I wish Pythonistas would be more willing to acknowledge the (few) >> drawbacks of the language (or implementation, in this case) instead of >> all this rationalization. > > Please provide more evidence that Pythonistas are unwilling to > acknowledge the drawbacks of the GIL. I think you're just spreading FUD. > The problem is that discussions about the GIL almost invariably include > false statements about the GIL, and I'm certainly not going to hamper my > writing to always include the caveats about GIL drawbacks while > correcting the wrong information.
Aahz, my magic pixie dust bag is empty. Do you have some spare dust to remove the cursed GIL all alone? :p Christian -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
