Albert van der Horst <alb...@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> writes:
> But I greatly prefer a set
>
> "
> for i in {point1,point2,point3}:
> statements
> "
Agreed, for the reasons you cite. I think this idiom can be expected to
become more common and hopefully displace using a tuple literal or list
literal, as the set literal syntax becomes more reliably available on
arbitrary installed Python versions.
> [Yes I know { } doesn't denote a set. I tried it. I don't know how to
> denote a set ... ]
Try it in Python 3 and be prepared to be pleased
<URL:http://docs.python.org/3.0/whatsnew/3.0.html#new-syntax>.
--
\ “Too many Indians spoil the golden egg.” —Sir Joh |
`\ Bjelke-Petersen |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
