Terry Reedy: > Jochen Schulz wrote: >> >> If, by "object-oriented" you mean "everything has to be put into >> classes", then Python is not object-oriented. > > That depends on what you mean by 'put into classes' (and 'everything').
:) What I meant was that in Python you can write code without defining
your own classes at all. I had Java in mind where you cannot write a
program without using the keyword 'class'. But I think we agree here.
J.
--
In idle moments I remember former lovers with sentimental tenderness.
[Agree] [Disagree]
<http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
