i would like to add to my previous post that if an option like SQLite with a python interface (pysqlite) would be orders of magnitude faster than naive python options, i'd prefer that. but if that's not the case, a pure python solution without dependencies on other things would be the best option.
thanks for the suggestion, will look into gadfly in the meantime. On Jun 17, 11:38 pm, Emile van Sebille <em...@fenx.com> wrote: > On 6/17/2009 8:28 PM per said... > > > hi all, > > > i'm looking for a native python package to run a very simple data > > base. i was originally using cpickle with dictionaries for my problem, > > but i was making dictionaries out of very large text files (around > > 1000MB in size) and pickling was simply too slow. > > > i am not looking for fancy SQL operations, just very simple data base > > operations (doesn't have to be SQL style) and my preference is for a > > module that just needs python and doesn't require me to run a separate > > data base like Sybase or MySQL. > > You might like gadfly... > > http://gadfly.sourceforge.net/gadfly.html > > Emile > > > > > does anyone have any recommendations? the only candidates i've seen > > are snaklesql and buzhug... any thoughts/benchmarks on these? > > > any info on this would be greatly appreciated. thank you > > -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
