On Jun 17, 5:47 am, Bruno Desthuilliers <bruno. 42.desthuilli...@websiteburo.invalid> wrote: > John Yeung a écrit : > > But mathematically speaking, it's intuitive that "nothing" would match > > any type. > > IOW, what's the OP is after is not the None type, but some yet > unexisting "Anything" type !-)
The behaviors of the 'anything' object are a subset of those of any other object. I don't believe that 'subset' is a proper characterization of the relationship between the methods of a subclass and the methods of its superclass. But 'superset' may be. Should 'object' inherit from None? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
