Single - thread programming is great! clean, safe!!! I'm trying schedual task to several work process (not thread). On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 4:49 AM, MRAB <pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote:
> Kaz Kylheku wrote: > >> ["Followup-To:" header set to comp.lang.lisp.] >> On 2009-06-04, Roedy Green <see_webs...@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 09:46:44 -0700 (PDT), Xah Lee <xah...@gmail.com> >>> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : >>> >>> • Why Must Software Be Rewritten For Multi-Core Processors? >>>> >>> Threads have been part of Java since Day 1. >>> >> >> Unfortunately, not sane threads designed by people who actually understand >> multithreading. >> >> The nice thing about Java is whether you are on a single core >>> processor or a 256 CPU machine (We got to run our Athena Integer Java >>> spreadsheet engine on such a beast), does not concern your code. >>> >> >> You are dreaming if you think that there are any circumstances (other than >> circumstances in which performance doesn't matter) in which you don't have >> to >> concern yourself about the difference between a uniprocessor and a 256 CPU >> machine. >> > > If you're interested in parallel programming, have a look at Flow-Based > Programming: > > http://www.jpaulmorrison.com/fbp/ > > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list >
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
