"Tomas Svarovsky" <svarovsky.to...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:747b0d4f-f9fd-4fa6-bb6d-0a4365f32...@b1g2000vbc.googlegroups.com...
> This is a good point, but then it would manifest regardless of the > language used AFAIK. And this is not the case, ruby and php > implementations are working quite fine. What I meant was: not reading the data and leaving the connection open is going to force the server to handle all 100 requests concurrently. I'm guessing that's not what your other implementations do. What happens to the timing if you call response.read(), response.close() ? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
