On May 12, 8:27 am, rump...@web.de wrote: > > > > The language and library are missing arbitrary precision integer > > > > arithmetic, using GMP or something like that. > > > > True, but currently not a high priority for me. > > > Too bad. That makes Nimrod officially "worthless", i.e., of no > > value to me. > > Well, you could write a wrapper for GMP (and contribute to the > project ;-)).
But such a thing already exists in Python. And I spend my time USING arbitrary precision numbers to do math research. Just thought you'ld like to be aware that some people actually make their language choices based on the availability (and performance) of arbitrary precision numbers. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
