> Which will produce the same output as the original, confounding > your user. You could just write the new values out, since .read > picks the last entry (as I believe it should). Alternatively, if > you want to replace it "in place", you'll need a bit more smarts > when there is more than one copy of a file in the archive (when > z.namelist.count(filename) > 1).
I think I'll just hope that there will never be an ODF file like that, and if there is, then it's not my problem :) -- дамјан ( http://softver.org.mk/damjan/ ) Give me the knowledge to change the code I do not accept, the wisdom not to accept the code I cannot change, and the freedom to choose my preference. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
