Colin J. Williams <c...@ncf.ca> wrote: > Esmail wrote: > > What is the consensus of the Python community regarding these > > code checkers? > > > > In particular, are the stylistic recommendations that > > pylint makes considered sensible/valid? > > pylint seems a bit heavy handled, a bit > too much PEP 8, which was intended as a > guide, rather than a prescription.
I've been very happy with pychecker. I found pylint a bit too fussy (rather like the original C lint!) Note that if you run pychecker from emacs (M-x compile, then "pychecker module_name") you can then click in its output window to go to the correct line of code. -- Nick Craig-Wood <n...@craig-wood.com> -- http://www.craig-wood.com/nick -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
