On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 14:06:08 -0700, "Robert Brewer"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
>> >y = (f(11, 22, x=1, y='y for f') *
>> > g(*args_from_somewhere,
>> > x='x for g', y='y for g',
>> > foo=lambda: return 'foo for g'))
>> >
>> >would be my current way to express this. But still, the less lines,
>> >the less confusing it is.
>
>And Ron Adam replied:
>> I would probably do it this way.
>>
>> y = f(11, 22, x=1, y='y for f') \
>> * g( *args_from_somewhere,
>> x='x for g',
>> y='y for g',
>> foo=lambda: return 'foo for g' )
>
>Which are both prettier, until you actually try to use them:
>
>>>> g( *args_from_somewhere, x='x for g', y='y for g', foo=lambda:
>return 'foo for g' )
>Traceback ( File "<interactive input>", line 1
> g( *args_from_somewhere, x='x for g', y='y for g', foo=lambda:
>return 'foo for g' )
> ^
>SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>
I didn't test that particular part.. but this should work. It wasn't
the fault of the formatting. ;-)
def f(a,b,x=None,y=None):
return 1
def g( args,x=None,y=None,foo=None):
return 1
args_from_somewhere = (23,24)
y = f(11, 22, x=1, y='y for f') \
* g( args_from_somewhere,
x='x for g',
y='y for g',
foo=lambda foo: 'foo for g' )
print y
1
>
>Robert Brewer
>MIS
>Amor Ministries
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
