In message <pan.2009.04.21.03.12...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au>, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Everybody understands what you mean when you say something is tasty, even > though everyone's understanding of tasty is different. You don't need to > agree on what tasty *is* to agree that something *isn't* tasty But you do if you want to describe something as "purely tasty". > We don't need to agree on what OO means to know that Python isn't purely > OO. We don't need to agree on what OO means to know that Python has OO. But we do need to agree if we want to say it's "purely OO" or not. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
