Deep_Feelings wrote: > On Apr 17, 1:52 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <de...@nospam.web.de> wrote: >> Deep_Feelings wrote: >> > qt include many libraries : network , threading,database ..etc while >> > Wxwidgets seem similar but with less scope >> >> > my question is : does these frameworks replace python's (or any other >> > language for that matter) built-in libraries ? or python does not >> > include that sort of libraries ? >> >> Some it includes, others it doesn't. And they come with different >> features. >> >> While python comes with a lot of included batteries, for some things you >> need a more powerful generator - that's where 3rd-party-libraries come >> into play. >> >> There are plenty of discussions about which GUI-toolkit is the best - >> google this group. >> >> However, mostly people agree that Qt is the most powerful, but often was >> debunked because of it's licensing. This has changed to the much more >> liberal LGPL for Qt4.5. >> >> Now it might be though that you'd still need to buy a license from Phil >> Thompson for his excellent PyQt-wrapping - but I'd personally say it's >> more worth than it actually costs given the power of Qt. >> >> Diez > > thank you > > considering that wxwidget is open source and free do you think that QT > lisencing is worth it ?
What do you think I wrote the following sentence for? """ Now it might be though that you'd still need to buy a license from Phil Thompson for his excellent PyQt-wrapping - but I'd personally say it's more worth than it actually costs given the power of Qt. """ Diez -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
