Newbie question: Looking through my stack of books and various on-line
references, I have seen several libraries and library functions listed
as depreciated.
Is there a road map or concrete list of what parts of the standard
library are to be considered reliable and permanent? Coming from C, I
am used to library functions being set in stone.
Can I reasonably expect that code using, for instance xml.dom.minidom
will still work in 10 years?
Do all depreciated libraries print warnings when they are imported? I
see that if I print xmllib, I get the message "The xmllib module is
obsolete. Use xml.sax instead." Is this behavior followed
consistently, to give a "this code might not work come this time next
year" warning?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
- Re: How standard is the standard library? steve.leach