gert wrote: > On Apr 3, 10:10 pm, Christian Heimes <li...@cheimes.de> wrote: >> gert wrote: >>> I do understand, and I went looking into pySerial, but it is a long >>> way from getting compatible with python3.x and involves other libs >>> that are big and non pyhton3.x compatible. >> So don't use Python 3.0. Most people are still using Python 2.5 or 2.6. > > With all respect but why do people in general avoid the question when > they do not know something? > I appreciate the answer and its a valid solution, never the less > useless in the answer I seek.
You are missing some background information. :) I've spent a considerable amount of time with the design and development of Python 3.0. I don't mention the fact in order to show off. I just wanna explain to you that my suggestion has a solid background. You are going throw a lot of unnecessary pain and suffering. Python 3.0 is for people, who like to play with cutting edge software and for library developers, that port their code to 3.0. I appreciate your hard work but it's really the wrong way. If you like to offer your help then help the developers of pyserial. Please don't try to come by with a hacky approach as using the old MS DOS magic files. Christian -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
