On 2009-04-04 12:07, Tim Wintle wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 02:03 -0500, Robert Kern wrote:
Let's be clear: python-ideas seems positive on the idea of adding a .clear()
method. *Completely removing* slice assignment has not been broached there.

Yup, sorry - I did mean to refer to the initial suggestion, rather than
my comments

(I didn't expect such strong responses btw!)
You are proposing the removal of a general, orthogonal feature (and breaking
code in consequence!) just because of a new syntax for a single special case of
that feature. That is quite simply ridiculous.

Ok, I may have come across a little strongly (was very tired) - I'm not
_actually_ saying we should remove it, I'm just pointing out why
adding .clear() to lists seems to be unnecessary and slightly messy. The
suggested removal of assignments to slices is a theoretical statement.

But can you see why your wording might lead the rest of us to believe otherwise? :-)

.clear() would be non-orthogonal syntactic sugar. That's okay! Python has
syntactic sugar in a number of other places, too! Appropriate doses of syntactic
sugar and non-orthogonality are precisely what lets you implement "There should
be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it." The really key word in
that sentence is "obvious", not "one".

FWIW, removing slice assignment would be a gross form of non-orthogonality, too.
__getitem__, __setitem__ and __delitem__ should all be able to accept the same
indices (or else raise exceptions in the case of immutability).

hummm - I'm sure it would be confusing behaviour if it was not
available, but I'm not sure how it would be non-orthogonal

I might be abusing the term, but to me, orthogonality doesn't just mean avoiding overlapping functionality. It also means not putting in special-case limitations for otherwise general features. It would be odd if you could use integer indices for __getitem__, __setitem__ and __delitem__, but slice indices would work for __getitem__ and not the others.

--
Robert Kern

"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
 that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
 an underlying truth."
  -- Umberto Eco

--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to