Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > In message <tq7ca6-8es....@ozzie.tundraware.com>, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > >> ,,, when I suggested that better open source tools existed, they kindly >> explained their complete lack of interest in moving several millions >> of lines of code to anything new. > > What was their explanation? >
Their entire internal workflow from development through final release and deployment was built around these ancient/nonstandard toolset. It was economically infeasible to retool both the technology and the processes for millions of lines of code under version control - there just wasn't an ROI for it. This is not uncommon in large legacy environments in my experience. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
