Dennis Lee Bieber presented a code snippet with two consecutive statements
that made me think, "I'd code this differently". So just for fun ... is
Dennis's original statement or my "_alt" statement more idiomatically
Pythonic? Are there even more Pythonic alternative codings?
mrkrs = [b for b in block
if b > 127
or b in [ "\r", "\n", "\t" ] ]
mrkrs_alt1 = filter(lambda b: b > 127 or b in [ "\r", "\n", "\t" ],
block)
mrkrs_alt2 = filter(lambda b: b > 127 or b in list("\r\n\t"), block)
(Note: Dennis's statement converts a string into a list; mine does not.)
---
binary = (float(len(mrkrs)) / len(block)) > 0.30
binary_alt = 1.0 * len(mrkrs) / len(block) > 0.30
-John
E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386)
Database version: 5.12090
http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
