On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:29:56 -0700, Chris Rebert <c...@rebertia.com> wrote:
>Sort of, but it's *really* not idiomatic. You'd have to declare the >arrays to be one longer than they actually are so that array[N] is a >valid index. And then you'd end up not using the true first element of >the array. Not to mention most library functions use 0-numbering, so >you'd have to work around that as well. > >So, it can be done, but you're going against the grain of the language. I use fortran libraries, so that is not a problem for me. I only make the change once, while transferring the elements ... uhmm, make that twice. I wrote in my other post, 0 is weird to me, I have model of solution on paper ... if I keep 0 then all comes out different. And while comparing, I always get them mixed up. That's why I always try to adapt it to the paper situation. Lada > >Cheers, >Chris -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
