On Mar 31, 11:06 am, pataphor <patap...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 06:03:13 -0700 (PDT) > > Alex_Gaynor <alex.gay...@gmail.com> wrote: > > My inclination would be to more or less *just* have it implement the > > set API, the way ordered dict does in 2.7/3.1. > > As far as I can tell all that would be needed is read/write access to > two key variables: The iterator start position and the underlying map. > There is no need for more than basic set API since people can use > those two variables to subclass their own iterators. > > P.
The only issue with that is if we ever moved it to a C implementation we'd probably use a more conventional linked list. Alex -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
