Peter Herndon wrote:
> Another option is adodbapi, which in my experience is much faster than
> mx.ODBC.  

Much faster ?

See 
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windows2000serv/technologies/iis/reskit/iischp7.mspx
and scroll down to Table 7.1:

      Table 7.1 TPS (transactions per second) Per Number of Threads by MDAC 
Technology
      Threads   1       2       5       10      20      50
      ODBC      66.37   146.28  350.46  626.76  900.24  859.91
      OLEDB     67.30   141.92  326.19  590.57  794.91  715.78
      OLEDB 2.0 61.73   126.93  297.29  506.75  575.35  526.61
      ADO 2.0   51.24   108.12  240.91  377.30  361.26  310.34

> You can find it at http://adodbapi.sourceforge.net , and it
> is Windows-only.  There's also http://pymssql.sourceforge.net, which is
> cross-platform using FreeTDS and unixodbc on *nix.  I haven't any
> experience with it, though.

-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg
eGenix.com

Professional Python Services directly from the Source  (#1, Apr 15 2005)
>>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ...        http://www.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ...             http://zope.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ...        http://python.egenix.com/
________________________________________________________________________

::: Try mxODBC.Zope.DA for Windows,Linux,Solaris,FreeBSD for free ! ::::
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to