-On [20090318 04:01], Lobo (carlosgali...@gmail.com) wrote: >I am wondering whether I can jump directly to Python 3.x (instead of >using Python 2.6), depending of course on psycopg2 compatibility?.
Might I suggest sticking to 2.6 for now? The 2.x series is what is now going around as 'stable' in the Python world. Almost all third-party modules are written for 2.x (typically 2.3 or 2.4 and higher). 3.0 is very new and the documentation and modules are not just up to the standard of the 2.x series. Using 3.0 right now will get you little added benefit at this point in time. Also, chalk up my preference for SQLAlchemy. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/ | GPG: 2EAC625B The thought of a moment is as fleeting as the memory of it intense... -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
