John Nagle wrote:
That "wizard" won't even install unless Python 3.0 is "in the
registry", which apparently means "installed as the default Python".
No, it just means "installed somewhere". I have 6 different
versions of Python installed on this box. The choice of
which is "the default" is mine, either by selection at
installation or by later manipulation of associations,
path etc.
After giving the user an alert box, it dumps you into a dialog which
says "Python 3.0 is required for this package. Select installation to
use".
That's blank, and the form fields "Python Directory" and "Installation
Directory" won't accept input, so it can't even be overridden manually.
I agree that this is annoying.
Lame.
And no, I don't want to build it from source. I'm just checking to
see how close Python 3.x is getting to prime time. Looks like it's
still a long way off.
While I don't feel strongly about the matter -- I have no particular
need to use Python 3.x for now, altho' I'm tracking it -- I think
that you're making quite a far-reaching statement on scant evidence. Fair
enough, you couldn't do a quick-and-dirty install of pywin32-213
for Python 3.x without having Python 3.x installed and in the
registry. To go from that to claiming that Python 3.x is a long
way from prime time seems at the very least to ignore the legions
of non-Windows users who neither know nor care about pywin32.
TJG
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
