On 12 Mar, 12:45, Dotan Cohen <dotanco...@gmail.com> wrote: > [starting with 2.6]
> I do not think that is the best way to go about learning Python. Why > learn an arguably depreciating version when the new version is > available. I agree that there are not many tutorial written for Python > 3 however there are enough to get going: most of the Python 2 > tutorials are redundant. Sticking to Python 3 tutorials will give him > a higher signal-to-noise ratio in the tutorials that he finds. So we are to conclude that Python 2 is redundant now, are we? I don't think it's bad advice to suggest that people learn Python 2 if they want to get stuff done, and since people keep saying how Python 3 is really the same language, let us entertain that assertion and encourage people to take advantage of its predecessor: the thing which actually powers the overwhelming majority of Python-powered systems today and for the foreseeable future. Paul -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
