On Mar 10, 6:38 am, Daniel Fetchinson <fetchin...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> On 3/9/09, bearophileh...@lycos.com <bearophileh...@lycos.com> wrote:
>
> > See here Daniel Fetchinson:
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_thread/thread/...
>
> > But be quite careful in using that stuff, it has some traps.
>
> Thanks a lot for all the helpful replies!
> Yes, I should name the unnamed lambda function, or better, just use 'def'.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> --
> Psss, psss, put it down! -http://www.cafepress.com/putitdown
Sort of tangenitally; is there any real difference between the outcome
of the two following pieces of code?
a = lambda x: x+2
def a(x):
return x+2
Iain
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
