On Feb 25, 4:48 am, mathieu <mathieu.malate...@gmail.com> wrote: > I did not know where to report that: > > 'u' Obselete type – it is identical to 'd'. (7) > > http://docs.python.org/library/stdtypes.html#string-formatting
So what's your problem with that? Do you believe that 'u' is not accepted? That 'u' is not identical to 'd' and thus the doc should be rewritten as "its behaviour is identical to that of 'd'"? That the behaviour of 'u' is NOT identical to that of 'd'? That 'u' should not be documented? That 'u' should not be described as obselete? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list