2009/2/7 andrew cooke <and...@acooke.org>: > > there's a justification for this awful mess here - > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2006-March/000104.html > > i didn't know about this, and even after reading steven's broken (i > assume) example, managed to get it backwards.
What's awful about it? Except in the sense of inspiring awe, of course. No, Steven's example isn't broken, it works as the epydoc authors intended. > (it's still in 3). Good. -- Tim Rowe -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list