2009/2/7 andrew cooke <and...@acooke.org>:
>
> there's a justification for this awful mess here -
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2006-March/000104.html
>
> i didn't know about this, and even after reading steven's broken (i
> assume) example, managed to get it backwards.

What's awful about it? Except in the sense of inspiring awe, of
course. No, Steven's example isn't broken, it works as the epydoc
authors intended.

> (it's still in 3).

Good.

--
Tim Rowe
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to