M Kumar wrote: > Object oriented languages doesn't allow execution of the code without > class objects, what is actually happening when we execute some piece of > code, is it bound to any class? > Those who have time and consideration can help me
a) This is a purely theoretical consideration. You asked whether "python is a pure object oriented language", but this will inevitably lead to obscure discussions about what you mean rather than what Python is. b) You seem to believe that a "pure" object oriented language must do everything using classes. Since many problems are just as easy (or easier) to solve with a procedural approach, Python takes the view that it should be easy to provide such solutions as well. c) import this The Zen of Python, by Tim Peters [...] practicality beats purity [...] We aren't big on purity in the Python world ;-) regards Steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
