Russ P. a écrit :
On Jan 26, 1:07 am, Bruno Desthuilliers <bruno.
42.desthuilli...@websiteburo.invalid> wrote:
No. I can change the *team's* code. Please *read*. "team's ownership",
ok ? Or do I have to spell it out loud ? TEAM'S OWNERSHIP. Uh. You get
the message, now ?
Team ownership doesn't necessarily mean that you can just change code
at will.
Nope, but it surely means that I'm *not* changing "someone else's" code.
In industry, teams usually have a leader that you need to
check with before you can change an interface.
This is totally unrelated.
Would you give all those developers your password to get into the
system? No? Wait a minute ... you mean you wouldn't "trust" them with
your password? But what about "openness"? Are you some sort of fascist
or what?
Goodwin point. You loose. Good bye again, Mr P.
You missed the point once again. In asking if you are a "fascist," I
was *parodying* your attitude that languages with enforced access
restrictions are for "fascists" who don't trust their co-workers or
employees. [I don't recall if you actually used that word
I did not, and you should know better.
or if it was
someone else, but you did use "B&D", which carries the same general
impression.]
Can't you tell the difference, really ?
So I parodied your hyperbole,
Still not. But it's interesting to note that you consider everyone
disagreeing with you as basically the same person.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
