On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:04:44 -0500 Steve Holden <st...@holdenweb.com> wrote:
> Andreas Waldenburger wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:51:41 +0100 "Diez B. Roggisch" > > <de...@nospam.web.de> wrote: > > > >> gert schrieb: > >>> {'test': 'test'} > >>> {"test": "test"} > >>> > >>> It can not be that hard to support both notation can it ? > >> It's not hard, but it's not standard-conform. > >> > > OK, playing the devil's advocate here: Doesn't practicality beat > > purity? > > > It's not practical to expect a standard to be rewritten to conform > with the ideas of one individual, as well as all the implementations > of that standard. > But as gert says, the standard is "broken" by many many browsers already (I don't know if that's true, though; I just assume it is). Why not make it compatible with, and as forgiving as, those? (I feel a bit stupid here, because I'm basically on the "adhere to the standard" side. I just noticed that the Zen (or what I make of it) seems to suggest otherwise.) regards, /W -- My real email address is constructed by swapping the domain with the recipient (local part). -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list