Steven D'Aprano <st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au> writes: > But by focusing on such a small aspect of my post (a quarter of my > text),
It clearly was important to you, since you phrased it in highly emotive terms (and even, by your account, had to scale the emotion back a little). So, I don't think the proportion of number-of-characters is relevant there. > while ignoring the more substantial aspects Sure, I took that one part and made a new topic from it. This is open discussion, man. I even changed the subject field to be clear :-) > it seems that you are giving tacit approval of precisely the > attitude I am objecting to: that there is a One True And Correct > Right Way to learn and/or use Python. Nope. -- \ “Madness is rare in individuals, but in groups, parties, | `\ nations and ages it is the rule.” —Friedrich Nietzsche | _o__) | Ben Finney -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
