Luis Zarrabeitia <ky...@uh.cu> writes: > Why don't you do it backwards? > You *can* implement a metaclass that will remove the dynasmism from its > instances. Do it - I can give you a starting point if you wish.
That's kind of interesting, how does it work? > But most of us are very happy with the dynamic nature of python... I chose > python _because_ of it. I like it too, since it is indispensable in some situations. But, those situations are uncommon enough that I don't mind typing a few extra keystrokes to turn the dynamism on. > Btw, for performance, there is __slots__, That is a good point, we somehow lost sight of that in this thread. > with the side-effect that it forbids attribute creation 'on the > fly'. I have had the impression that this is a somewhat accidental side effect and shouldn't be relied on. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
