On Jan 13, 2009, at 1:22 AM, Steve Holden wrote:
Philip Semanchuk wrote:
On Jan 12, 2009, at 6:48 PM, ajaksu wrote:
On Jan 11, 11:59 pm, "James Mills" <prolo...@shortcircuit.net.au>
wrote:
Hey all,
The following fails for me:
from urllib2 import urlopen
f =
urlopen("http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-announce/feed/rss_v2_0_msgs.xml
")
Traceback (most recent call last):
[...]
Any helpful ideas ?
Maybe raise a real bug @ bugs.python.org instead of just
mentioning it
like I did: http://bugs.python.org/msg77889
I think at least some sites would be willing to add the new UA to
their whitelists.
I don't think I understand you clearly. Whether or not Google et al
whitelist the Python UA isn't a Python issue, is it?
I'd say it's an issue relevant to Python users, which woudl seem to
put
it pretty much in the mainstream for c.l.py - especially as the code
causing concern was written in Python.
I didn't mean to imply that the conversation didn't belong here. I
think that is perfectly appropriate. What I don't understand is the
suggestion that Google's server config should be raised as a bug
against Python. (i.e. "raise a real bug @ bugs.python.org...")
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
