On Jan 12, 5:34 am, Mensanator <mensana...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Jan 11, 12:12 pm, Roy Smith <r...@panix.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > <5db6181f-d6f6-4bdc-88c8-e12ad228c...@r41g2000prr.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > Mensanator <mensana...@aol.com> wrote:
> > > > What are all those line continuation characters ('\') for? ?You are
> > > > aware
> > > > that they are unnecessary here?
>
> > > Actually, I wasn't aware of that. A quick review shows
> > > why. In the old manuals, implicit line continuation
> > > was in a seperate chapter (2.1.6) from implicit (2.1.5)
> > > so if you didn't read past 2.1.5 you would have missed it.
>
> > My philosophy about line continuation is to assume lines can be continued
> > after just about any piece of punctuation. If I'm wrong, the computer will
> > tell me, and then I make the computer happy by adding a \. It's easier
> > than looking it up, and way easier than memorizing the details.
>
> I proably got mine from Visual Basic where there are no
> exceptions to explicit line continuation marks. A least
> adding them when not necessary doesn't cause a problem.
Fugly code is not a problem?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
