On Dec 12, 11:17 am, sturlamolden <sturlamol...@yahoo.no> wrote: > On Dec 12, 3:04 pm, Luis M. González <luis...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Why don't you guys google a little bit to know what's being done to > > address python's "slowness"?? > > Nothing is being done, and woth Py3k it got even worse. > > > It has been mentioned in this thread the pypy project (isn't it enough > > for you??) > > Other hints: shedskin, psyco, pyrex... > > None of those projects addresses inefficacies in the CPython > interpreter, except for psyco - which died of an overdose PyPy. > > PyPy is interesting if they ever will be able to produce something > useful. They have yet to prove that. Even if PyPy can come up with a > Python JIT, they will still be decades behind the technologies of > Strongtalk and Java. That is the problem with reinventing the wheel > all over again. > > Not to forget LLVM and Parrot which also will support Python > frontends.
So, what's your conclusion? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
