On Dec 8, 6:43 pm, william tanksley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 5, 6:21 pm, "Daniel Fetchinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I'd like this new way of defining methods, what do you guys think? > > Anyone ready for writing a PEP? snip > > I see a lot of people are against it; I admit that it's not the status > quo, but that's not a sufficient argument against a change (it defeats > all possible changes). A more interesting argument against it is that > it's special "implicit" syntax; but I would argue that it merely > reflects the existing special syntax of method calls.
I claim that the burden of proof rests with the author of the proposal. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
