2008-12-08 Xah Lee wrote: > > Also, in this discussion, thanks to Thomas M Hermann's $20 offered to > > me for my challenge to you, that i have taken the time to show working > > code that demonstrate many problems in your code.
A moron, wrote: > You failed the challenge that you were given. you didn't give me a challenge. I gave you. I asked for $5 sincerity wage of mutal payment or money back guarantee, so that we can show real code instead of verbal fight. You didn't take it and do nothing but continue petty quarrel on words. Thomas was nice to pay me, which results in my code that is demonstratably faster than yours. (verified by a post from “jason-sage @@@ creativetrax.com”, quote: “So Xah's code is about twice as fast as Jon's code, on my computer.”, message can be seen at “ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/python/698196?do=post_view_threaded#698196 ” ) You refuse to acknowledge it, and continue babbling, emphasizing that my code should be some hundred times faster make valid argument. As i said, now pay me $300, i will then make your Mathematica code in the same level of speed as your OCmal. If it does not, money back guaranteed. Here's more precise terms i ask: Show me your OCmal code that will compile on my machine (PPC Mac, OSX 10.4.x). I'll make your Mathematica code in the same speed level as your OCmal code. (you claimed Mathematica is roughly 700 thousand times slower to your OCmal code. I claim, i can make it, no more than 10 times slower than the given OCmal code.) So, pay me $300 as consulting fee. If the result does not comply to the above spec, money back guaranteed. > You should accept the fact that Mathematica currently has these > insurmountable limitations. insurmountable ur mom. Xah ∑ http://xahlee.org/ ☄ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
