Warren DeLano wrote:
what I can't understand is the decision to break 2.6 instead of 3.0. 2.x was supposed to remain backwards compatible, with the thinking that 2.x would be maintained in parallel for quite some time. 3.x was supposed to be the compatibility break.
I do not understand why anyone would object to this perfectly cogent complaint of Warren's. Even if the deprecation warnings had not been invisible, the complaint would be valid. Alan Isaac -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
