Xah Lee wrote: > If [yo]u would like to learn [the] [E]nglish lang[uage] and writing insights > from me, > peruse:
/Au contraire/, I was suggesting a higher standard for your posts. > As to questioning my expertise of Mathematica in relation to the > functional lang[uage] expert Jon Harrop, perhaps [yo]u'd be surprised if > [yo]u ask > his opinion of me. My own opinion, is that my Mathematica expertise > surpasses his. My opinion of his opinion of me is that, my opinion on > Mathematica is not to be trifled with. I have no assertion or curiosity about Jon Harrop's expertise compared to yours. I was expressing my opinion of his expertise, which is high. > Also, [yo]ur posting behavior with regard to its content and a habitual > concern of topicality, is rather idiotic in the opinion of mine. On There is no reason for you to engage in an /ad hominem/ attack. It does not speak well of you to resort to deflection when someone expresses a contrary opinion, as you did with both Jon Harrop and with me. I suggest that your ideas will be taken more seriously if you engage in more responsible behavior. > the surface, the army of [yo]ur kind have the high spirit for the health > of community. But underneath, i [sic] think it is [yo]u who [a]r[e] the most > wortheless with regards to online computing forum's health. You are entitled to your opinion. I take no offense at your attempts to insult me. How does your obfuscatory behavior in any way support your technical points? -- Lew -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
