Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am very happy to say that x=1 implies that the value of x is the object > 1 itself, in fact I would insist on such a definition of value. > > If you insist that Python is call by value, the only way that can work is > by defining values to be references
That's a neat and concise way of summarising this whole thread. -- Arnaud -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
