On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 18:02:19 -0800 (PST), Mensanator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>> >I'm trying to write out a calendar for a year, in this form (imaginary
...
> Personally, I find the tradtional format
> worthless. I want to see the year represented as a single block
> of 52 weeks so I can tell at a glance how many weeks seperate
^^^^^^^^
Or 53 weeks.
> Mar 1 and Sep 13.
...
> ## program output
> ## Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
> ## 1 2 3 4 January 2009
> ## 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
> ## 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
> ## 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
> ## 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 February 2009
> ## 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
> ## 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
...
This is completely unrelated to Python, but damn, you are right!
Now that I see it, it's obviously better than the traditional format
you mention, the one that the Unix utility "cal -y" has used since
the 1980s or something.
/Jorgen
--
// Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu
\X/ snipabacken.se> R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
