Andreas Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, you won. I read in an (regretably old) guidline for improving
> Python's performance that you should prefer map() compared to list
> comprehensions. Apparently the performance of list comprehensions has
> improved a lot, which is great. (Or the overhead of calling map() got
> too big, but I hope this is not the case.) So, what is the purpose of
> map()? Should it too be deprecated?
map() is already slated for removal in Python 3.0.
<mike
--
Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/
Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
