Tim Chase wrote: > Though for each test, in 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5 that I've got > installed on my local machine, they each printed "s" in-order, > and the iteration occurred in-order as well, even without the > added "sorted(list(s))" code.
You need more tests then ;) >>> list(set([1,1000])) [1000, 1] By the way, sorted(s) is sufficient; sorted() accepts arbitrary iterables. Peter -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
