On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 09:24:30 GMT, "Raymond Hettinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[Peter Hansen] >> If py.test provides a driver utility that does >> effectively this, well, that's nice for users. If >> it doesn't run them as separate processes, it wouldn't >> suit me anyway. >> >> Still, it sounds like it does have a strong following >> of smart people: enough to make me want to take a >> closer look at it to see what the fuss is about. :-) > >FWIW, py.test scales nicely. Also, it takes less time to try >it out or read the docs than discuss it to death on a newsgroup. >The learning curve is minimal. > > Is there a package that is accessible without svn? Regards, Bengt Richter -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list