On Oct 18, 5:57 pm, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Should the note be removed, or should it say something like "Unicode > > file names are supported. New in Python 2.6."? Is there anything else > > that should be mentioned? > > The note should be corrected, documenting the behaviour implemented. > > > More on cp437: I see where you mentioned to the patch author that a > > unicode string should be encoded in cp437 if possible, but this was > > not done -- it first tries ascii. What are your views on what encoding > > should be assumed if the utf8 flag is not set? >
[lots of enlightenment snipped] Thanks heaps, Martin. Cheers, John -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
