On Oct 7, 10:15 pm, Fuzzyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 2, 1:06 pm,lkcl<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sep 3, 10:02 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Berco Beute: > > > > > I wonder what it would take to implement Python inJavaScriptso it > > > it's been done. http://pyjamas.sf.net > > That's hardly an implementation of Python inJavascript-
someone _is_ considering validating the pyjs.py interpreter to ensure that it's NP complete. however, it's an academic exercise that's not driven by an actual real-world need. basically, running pyjs.py and the standard python 2.5 "compile" module under pyv8. just for kicks :) so, the beginnings of the process - to bootstrap your way entirely into javascript-land, where you'd be able to "input" python and have it compiled _to_ javascript _by_ a python-to-javascript compiler which _itself_ has been compiled to javascript - the foundations have been laid. and it's not _as_ crazy as it sounds. sufficient tests to demonstrate unequivocably that the equivalent javascript _is_ equivalent; you then have pyv8 empirically demonstrating a ten times - TEN times for goodness sake - performance increase - that's got to be worth it. especially if it can be done "automagically", behind the scenes, so that when you type "python myapp.py" instead of executing forth-like byte code (myapp.pyc) you "execute" javascript (myapp.pyj). > it's a > partial Python toJavascripttranslator. compiler. python to javascript _compiler_ :) with a more complete python-to-javascript compiler in http://code.google.com/p/pyjamas subversion - you'll need the llpamies branch, but you'll _also_ need to go back to around sep 2007. somewhere in between then and now, luis tried to add proper support for **kwargs and he didn't complete it. > Still looks good though. yeh :) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
