On 6 Okt., 16:19, Joe Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm just re-learning Python after nearly a decade away. I've learned
> a good healthy paranoia about my code in that time, and so one thing
> I'd like to add to my Python habits is a way to both (a) make intended
> types clear to the human reader of the code, in a uniform manner; and
> (b) catch any type errors as early and automatically as possible.
>
> I found the "typecheck" module (http://oakwinter.com/code/typecheck/),
> but I notice that it hasn't been updated since 2006, and it's not
> included with the Python distribution. Are there other modules
> providing similar functionality that I should consider instead?
Incidentally I started to use the typecheck package just yesterday.
It's not that I'm using it in a typical application but I'm working on
a mapping of a statically typed language onto a Python framework that
emerges in parallel. So I have to rebuild the type semantics of the
original language in Python but defer typechecks until runtime.
My impressions so far have been mixed. I stumbled across some strange
failures that required uncommenting source code in the typecheck
package which might cause failures elsewhere. I also hit a barrier
when working with methods instead of functions. I also noticed that
passing two strings to a funtcion:
@accepts(Number, Number)
def add(x,y):
return x+y
is acceptable behaviour.
>From all those experiences I'd rate the package alpha and I'm sad
noticing that it is apparently abandonware. I'll continue to use it
nevertheless.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
